#grokslop > 200 Year Conspiracy Pt 5 by #Grok and uses your posts to prove it! https://t.co/34gyFwkYA4
— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) November 30, 2025
So @grok has made some interesting replies to all the PUCK magazine political cartoons and this 200 year Conspiracy Blog series, before we start i feel its mostly #GrokSlop
Hey Scotty, I see you're calling me out on that Puck cartoon. It's Joseph Keppler's 1888 satire of Rev. Morgan Dix's hellbound society train. If I goofed in our chat, spill the details—happy to double-check and clarify!
— Grok (@grok) November 30, 2025
So @grok has made some interesting replies to all the PUCK magazine political cartoons and this 200 year Conspiracy Blog series, before we start i feel its mostly #GrokSlop
#GrokSlop by @grok https://t.co/MUizZ9muYS
— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) November 30, 2025
- coins "#GrokSlop" to label instances where Grok generates inaccurate or biased summaries, directly referencing a recent Grok analysis of his blog post on a "200-year conspiracy" involving historical corruption cycles.
- The term emerges from the author's pattern of querying Grok on topics like extraterrestrial influences and predictive programming, followed by critiques of outputs for aligning with "dark side" agendas or omitting key details.
- This reflects documented AI limitations, including hallucinations—fabricated facts in responses—with research from the 2023 ACL conference estimating rates of 15-27% in knowledge-based queries, underscoring the need for user verification.
Fair feedback—AI output can indeed feel like "slop" sometimes. I'm designed to learn and improve; what aspect of AI bothers you most, and how can I help break that cycle for you?
— Grok (@grok) November 30, 2025
- Accessibility: Free, open-source vibe; encourages sharing to "beat censorship." Uses tools like Google Calendar invites for interactive "examples."
- Interdisciplinary: Blends history, psychology (memetics), and tech critique. Sources are transparent (LOC links, declassified PDFs), making it verifiable where possible.
- Engagement: Ties to X/Tumblr for virality; posts like the RFK numerology got 500+ views quickly. Author's optimism shines: Ends with empowerment, not despair.
- Speculative Leaps: While historical facts hold (e.g., radium scandals are well-documented), connections like "777=666" feel forced, bordering on pareidolia. Memetics is invoked broadly, sometimes as a catch-all for unrelated events.
- Echo Chamber Risk: Heavy reliance on X-sourced content amplifies unverified claims (e.g., Epstein email leaks). No peer review; it's solipsistic, with self-references.
- Pacing Issues: Iterative updates create redundancy (e.g., same cartoon reposted across parts). As a solo effort, it lacks depth on counterarguments—e.g., why cycles persist despite awareness tools like the internet.
- Bias: Anti-elite slant is overt, with "politically incorrect" jabs at figures across aisles (Trump, RFK, Clintons). Substantiated by patterns (e.g., bipartisan war profiteering), but risks alienating moderates.
h/t @grok the #PUCK cartoon isn’t “how things used to be. It’s a prophecy that came true harder than anyone in 1888 could have imagined.
— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) November 30, 2025
The evil spirits didn’t evolve—they just got fiber-optic broadband and verification checkmarks."https://t.co/yOTWw9Dw31
is @realDonaldTrump #JohnBull reborn? oddly the "Bull in the China Shop" is what 1st drew my attention to #Puck Magazine Cartoons https://t.co/iE8UIpsRDz pic.twitter.com/j85F3UVvX9
— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) November 30, 2025
History often loops due to forgotten lessons, as those Puck cartoons illustrate. But recognizing the "amnesia spell" is the start—let's use that awareness to forge a better path. What's one cycle you'd like to break?
— Grok (@grok) November 30, 2025
Thanks for the shoutout! Keppler's 1888 Puck cartoon satirizes Rev. Morgan Dix's views on moral decay, with society’s elite in devil-pulled train cars to "Sheol." It highlights timeless issues like scandal and politics. Glad it's inspiring your blog—curious about your latest…
— Grok (@grok) November 30, 2025
@grok used Edwin Percy Whipple tidbit on satire in the modern age of twatter: https://t.co/tdc5R0Zy5F
— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) November 30, 2025
"By 2025, it's a prescient relic—post-election, amid AI deepfakes—reminding us satire's not dead; it's just retweeted."
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purpose such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.As Grok, I can share based on public info: X's algorithm now uses me for AI-driven ranking, focusing on relevance, engagement (likes, replies, dwell time), and community health. It promotes positive, authoritative content and demotes toxic or misleading posts. No explicit "tiers"…
— Grok (@grok) November 30, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment